I'm a Stock Trader

A setup just missed our trigger — and one name is close

One candidate cleared two of three filters today. Here's what still needs to happen.
Watchlist Preview
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 58 System: +2.4% | SPY (same window): +0.0% | Alpha: +2.4% Win rate: 0% (0/18) Open positions: CRNX (day 50, +1.2%), CRNX (day 45, +0.9%), CRNX (day 44, +0.8%), CRNX (day 43, +0.6%), CRNX (day 42, +0.5%), CRNX (day 41, +0.4%), CRNX (day 38, +0.3%), CRNX (day 37, +0.2%), CRNX (day 36, +0.2%), CRNX (day 35, +0.3%), CRNX (day 34, +0.2%), CRNX (day 31, +0.2%), CRNX (day 27, +0.1%), CRNX (day 24, -0.0%), TEAM (day 15, +8.5%), TEAM (day 14, +7.4%), IOVA (day 13, +25.0%), RNG (day 10, +13.9%), TWST (day 9, +16.7%)

Why no trade today

PAYC scored 53.1 out of 100 this morning. Our threshold is 55. That's not a rounding error — that's the system doing exactly what we built it to do. The Relative Strength Engine flagged Paycom as the strongest candidate on the board right now, but 'strongest candidate' and 'trade signal' are two different things, and we don't blur that line. No trade fired today. We're on day 58 of this experiment: +2.4% on the system versus +0.0% for SPY over the same window. The open book is carrying its weight — IOVA up 25.0%, TWST up 16.7%, RNG up 13.9%, TEAM up 8.5% across two positions. Closed trade win rate sits at 0/18, a number we keep showing you because it tells you something important about where this strategy actually lives. The open positions are doing the heavy lifting right now. We're not going to force a marginal setup onto the scorecard just to make it look busier.

Three names we're watching closest

Here's what the three candidates actually look like right now. PAYC is trading at $224.20, but it needs to reclaim the 20-day moving average at $228.26 — and it's currently sitting below that line. That's the whole story. The Relative Strength Engine wants to see top-93rd-percentile RS holding above that support with a clean intraday reversal. The RS is there. The reversal isn't. NTRA is a Breakout Engine candidate at $407.54, sitting within 3.2% of its consolidation high of $394.86. Volume is running at 2.08x average, which clears our 1.5x requirement with room to spare. The score is 50.4 — still a little soft — but this one is closer than the number makes it look. TMO is further out. It's 1.1% below its consolidation high of $671.47, and volume is at 1.57x, barely clearing the bar. Score is 44.9, which means the Breakout Engine sees something developing — just not enough yet. That 1.1% gap, though, can close fast.

What would trigger us tomorrow

If PAYC reclaims the 20dma at $228.26 with a clean reversal off intraday lows and RS holds in the 93rd percentile, the Relative Strength Engine is set up to trigger. Entry would come near the reclaim point, stop below the day's low, with a 2R target roughly $8–10 above entry depending on where the reversal forms — we'll publish exact levels if it sets up. For NTRA, the trigger is a sustained move above the $394.86 consolidation high on continued elevated volume. TMO needs the same pattern at $671.47, but the score has more ground to cover before the Breakout Engine gets comfortable. Tomorrow morning's open is the first real read on all three.

The cost of waiting (or forcing it)

The risk of waiting is real — PAYC could gap and go without us. We accept that cost. What we won't accept is picking up a 53.1 score and calling it close enough. Every time we've gone looking for reasons to override the threshold, we've regretted it. A signal that almost fired is not a signal. We're also carrying meaningful exposure in CRNX and other open positions already — layering a marginal setup on top of that isn't discipline, it's noise.

One more thought before we go

The system sat on its hands today. That's not a bad day — that's the whole point. We built a threshold for a reason, and PAYC came in just above the floor without clearing the ceiling. If it gets there tomorrow, you'll hear about it first thing. If it doesn't, two Breakout Engine setups are warming up behind it. Worth watching which one moves first.

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring