The number our system needed today was -7.41%
Today's market and our positions
QLYS just reminded us what stops are for. The position triggered its stop today after a 16-day hold, closing down 7.41% against a market that only dropped 1.07% over the same window. That's a -6.34% alpha drag on a single name — the kind of exit that stings, but also exactly what the stop was designed to do: cut the bleeding before it deepens. Meanwhile, SPY finished near $557.81, off about 0.60% on the session. The broader tape is choppy but not panicking. Our portfolio, weighted heavily toward CRNX, is essentially flat across most of those positions — and on a red-market day, that's precisely the story the Relative Strength Engine is trying to tell.
What our open trades are doing
CRNX is doing its job. Twelve open positions spanning 11 to 37 days, and every single one is showing positive alpha versus SPY over its holding period — ranging from +0.62% on the day-22 entry up to +2.57% on the day-29 entry. The stock itself is roughly flat on a dollar basis, but SPY has been quietly leaking lower the entire time these positions have been open. That's what relative strength is supposed to look like: not necessarily going up, just going down less — or in this case, not going down at all while the index does. We're holding all of them. NWL is the weak link right now — day 14, down 3.93% from entry and underperforming SPY by 2.44 percentage points. It hasn't hit its stop, but it's not behaving the way a relative strength candidate should, and we're watching it closely. TEAM has two entries, both in the first two days. The day-1 entry is down 1.08% and showed zero alpha today. Too early to draw hard conclusions, but it belongs on the same watch list as NWL.
Today's closed trades, post-mortem
Here's the QLYS post-mortem, straight. We entered at $176.86, held for 16 days, and the stop triggered today at $163.76. That's a $13.10 loss per share, or -7.41%. The Relative Strength Engine flagged QLYS as a name outpacing SPY at entry. It did — for a while. Then it didn't. The stop existed precisely for this outcome: we don't hold through a thesis that's broken. The alpha comparison tells the honest story — QLYS underperformed the benchmark by more than 6 points over 16 days. We're not going to spin that. It's a loss, it counts, and it's in the record. The system now sits at -1.2% over 49 days versus SPY's flat line. Win rate stands at 0 of 17 closed trades. That number is what it is, and we're not hiding it.
What could change by tomorrow's open
A few things could shift before tomorrow's open. NWL is the most fragile name in the book right now — one more down session and we could be having a stop conversation. TEAM's day-1 entry is sitting with negative alpha after just two days, which isn't a crisis, but it isn't comfortable either. The bigger picture risk: if SPY gaps down hard overnight, CRNX's relative strength advantage gets tested in real time. The alpha numbers look strong on paper, but they only matter if the name actually holds while the index slides. Tomorrow will tell us whether that relationship stays intact.
What we're watching tomorrow
Tomorrow morning the engines will be scanning for names that held the way CRNX did today — flat to slightly up while everything else slid lower. Whether anything fresh clears the bar is the real question. Markets this choppy tend to produce a lot of almost-setups that never quite close. We'll know more at the open.
How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.
Keep exploring
- How we trade → — the exact rules behind every trade: the signals, the triggers, the sizing.
- How we built this → — the six losing trades, the rebuild, and the walk-forward gate.
- Browse the archive → — every signal we've published.
- Latest signals → — today's morning and afternoon reads.
- Follow by RSS → — morning, afternoon, or Sunday recap.