I'm a Stock Trader

A cleaner way to wait out a market that isn't ready

One name came within 5.8 points of a signal tonight — here's what it still needs.
Watchlist Preview
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 46 System: -0.4% | SPY (same window): +0.0% | Alpha: -0.4% Win rate: 0% (0/15) Open positions: CRNX (day 34, +1.2%), CRNX (day 29, +0.9%), CRNX (day 28, +0.8%), CRNX (day 27, +0.6%), CRNX (day 26, +0.5%), CRNX (day 25, +0.4%), CRNX (day 22, +0.3%), CRNX (day 21, +0.2%), CRNX (day 20, +0.2%), CRNX (day 19, +0.3%), CRNX (day 18, +0.2%), CRNX (day 15, +0.2%), QLYS (day 13, -2.9%), NWL (day 11, +0.0%), CRNX (day 11, +0.1%), CRNX (day 8, -0.0%), CAKE (day 6, -2.0%)

Why no trade today

THC is the name that came closest today — and closest still wasn't close enough. Our Relative Strength Engine scored it a 44.2 out of 100. The threshold is 50. So: no trade. The stock is trading at $266.20, sitting $1.59 below the 20-day moving average at $267.79 — near enough to keep your attention, not near enough to act. What we'd need to see is THC reclaim that moving average and print a clean intraday reversal while holding top 90th percentile relative strength. That's a specific ask, and the market doesn't owe us that today. We're 46 days into this experiment. The system is down 0.4% against SPY's flat 0.0% over the same window, which means we have every reason to stay patient and zero reason to force it. SPY itself is parked at $766.42, essentially unchanged on the day. We're holding it long while we wait for something that actually qualifies.

Three names we're watching closest

Behind THC, two other names are worth having on your screen. QCOM is on the Breakout Engine's radar with a score of 64.4 — higher than THC's, but a different kind of setup. It's trading at $176.51, and the engine is watching a consolidation high at $171.38. Volume is already running at 10.1x average, well above the 1.5x minimum the system requires. The catch: price has to stay within 3% of that range high to keep the setup alive. If conditions align, QCOM is the one we'd get most excited about. Then there's VLO, also flagged by the Breakout Engine at a score of 57.8. It's at $381.69, with a consolidation high at $375.11 — price is already within 1.8% of that level, and volume is running 2.27x average. In pure price terms, VLO is actually closer to triggering than QCOM. Two different engines, two different setups, both worth watching when tomorrow's open arrives.

What would trigger us tomorrow

There's no entry, no stop, no target today — because nothing triggered. Here's what has to happen for that to change. THC needs to reclaim and hold $267.79 on the 20-day moving average with a reversal setup and top-decile relative strength. QCOM needs to stay within 3% of $171.38 with volume holding elevated. VLO needs to hold near $375.11 with volume at or above 1.5x average. If any of those conditions are met at the open and the score clears 50, the Relative Strength or Breakout Engine will surface it. Until then, we wait — and watching carefully is its own form of preparation.

The cost of waiting (or forcing it)

Waiting has a real cost. If one of these names gaps up before the system confirms, we miss the move. We accept that. But the bigger risk runs in the other direction: taking a setup that scored 44 because impatience won and we wanted something to write about. Fifteen closed trades, zero wins so far. Adding a forced loser to that ledger helps no one. The open CRNX positions are all modestly positive — the best is up 1.2% on day 34 — while QLYS and CAKE are the sore spots at -2.9% and -2.0% respectively. Nothing catastrophic, but nothing to brag about either. Entry discipline is the one variable we can actually control right now, and it's not the day to loosen it.

One more thought before we go

Day 46, still watching. The more interesting question isn't whether THC fires tomorrow — it's whether a system carrying a 0% win rate across 15 trades is a patient system doing exactly what it should, or a system that needs a harder look at its filters. We don't have that answer yet. That's kind of the point.

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring