Why the next few closes could define this whole trade experiment
Advertisement · Sponsored by Weiss Ratings
564% or higher when the market doesn’t move?There’s a program with a history of finding stock winners …
On the market’s quietest days. Feb. 18, 2025, was a day of no action.
Yet this algorithm recommended a stock that went up 610%.
Oct. 18, 2021, was another boring day. But this software recommended a 564% winner that day.
April 10, 2023? Another tame day, another big win.790% since then in fact.
So how did it do it?
Today's market and our positions
SPY slipped -0.14% today and closed near $770. Not dramatic — just the market treading water, waiting on itself. Against that backdrop, the open book held its ground. The Relative Strength Engine has eight positions running simultaneously right now, which is a lot of names to keep honest. The good news: the ones that matter most are behaving. Day 23 of the experiment, and we're sitting at +2.9% system vs. +2.5% for SPY over the same window. Alpha of +0.4%. It's a thin edge — but it's an edge. We're not going to pretend that's some kind of statement result. It's early, the win rate on closed trades is 0 for 4, and that number doesn't disappear because the open book looks better. What's true is that the open positions are carrying weight the closed trades haven't yet. That's the dynamic we're watching.
What our open trades are doing
Let's go position by position. CORT is the standout — entered at $91.92 nine days ago and sitting at $110.69, up +20.4% vs. SPY +3.9% over the same stretch. That's +16.5% alpha. The Relative Strength Engine flagged this one when it was already showing leadership, and it hasn't given a tick of it back. SNOW is right behind it: day 10, entered at $270.92, now at $316.84, +16.9% vs. SPY +4.15%. +12.8% alpha. Both of these are exactly what the engine is designed to find and hold — names that keep outperforming on up days and don't bleed much on flat ones. DDOG is quieter but doing its job: entered at $254.75 eight days ago, now $284.14, +11.5% vs. SPY +5.5%. Still +6% alpha. Steady. Then there's EVC — and we have to be straight about this, because we're carrying three separate entries. The day 23 entry ($11.75) is underwater vs. SPY by -3.66%. The day 7 entry ($11.55) is also lagging by -3.35%. The day 3 entry ($11.39, now $11.60) is the only one with positive alpha, and barely — +0.25%. EVC is the weakest name in the book, and the concentration risk from three positions in the same ticker is real. Worth naming it plainly. PIII (day 2, -0.78%) is a small negative so far — SPY was down -0.20% over the same window, so it's only -0.58% alpha in the hole. New enough that we're not drawing conclusions. CRNX is brand new — day 1, entered at $83.93, now $84.00, essentially flat on a flat day for SPY. Nothing to read yet.
Today's closed trades, post-mortem
No trades closed today, so there's no post-mortem to run. The closed-trade win rate stays at 0 for 4 — that's the number that stings, and it belongs in the headline, not the footnotes. What we're watching now is whether CORT, SNOW, and DDOG close out with the kind of gains that offset those early exits. That's the math this engine is built around: a few big winners covering the smaller ones. We haven't seen that payoff land yet. Three of the current eight are setting it up.
What could change by tomorrow's open
A few things worth keeping front of mind before tomorrow's open. SPY is flat-to-slightly-down — if we get a down day with real teeth, EVC's three positions are the most exposed. They're already lagging, and broad selloffs don't favor the laggards. CORT and SNOW have enough cushion that a moderate pullback shouldn't flip them negative, but no position is immune. PIII is still new enough that we don't have a clean read on whether it wants to participate or fade. If the market opens weak, watch that one early for a signal either way. CRNX just started — day 1 data tells us almost nothing, and we'll treat it that way.
What we're watching tomorrow
Tomorrow morning the engines run fresh scans. With EVC dragging across three entries and the closed-trade win rate still sitting at zero, the real question isn't whether the system is working — it's whether CORT, SNOW, and DDOG will close out with enough return to answer that clearly. The next week or two should tell us.
Advertisement · Sponsored by Behind the Markets
|
How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.
Keep exploring
- How we trade → — the exact rules behind every trade: the signals, the triggers, the sizing.
- How we built this → — the six losing trades, the rebuild, and the walk-forward gate.
- Browse the archive → — every signal we've published.
- Latest signals → — today's morning and afternoon reads.
- Follow by RSS → — morning, afternoon, or Sunday recap.