I'm a Stock Trader

The laggard our system keeps betting on — and what happens next

Two positions are pulling away. One keeps fading. Tomorrow may force the question.
Scoreboard Update
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 22 System: +3.2% | SPY (same window): +2.7% | Alpha: +0.5% Win rate: 0% (0/4) Open positions: EVC (day 22, -1.0%), SNOW (day 9, +16.9%), CORT (day 8, +19.5%), DDOG (day 7, +13.1%), EVC (day 6, +0.7%), EVC (day 2, +2.1%), PIII (day 1, +1.3%)

Advertisement · Sponsored by Weiss Ratings

564% or higher when the market doesn’t move?

There’s a program with a history of finding stock winners …
On the market’s quietest days. Feb. 18, 2025, was a day of no action.
Yet this algorithm recommended a stock that went up 610%.
Oct. 18, 2021, was another boring day. But this software recommended a 564% winner that day.
April 10, 2023? Another tame day, another big win.790% since then in fact.
So how did it do it?

To see the details about this rare opportunity - Click here to find out.

Today's market and our positions

SPY closed near $772 today, up another 1.93% on the session. A tape this strong is actually the best stress test we have — it separates the positions doing real work from the ones the market is quietly leaving behind. Today, that separation was easy to see. Two names are pulling ahead. A few are tagging along. And one keeps lagging no matter how many times we've stepped in.

What our open trades are doing

CORT is the standout. Day 8, up 19.45% against SPY's 4.11% over the same window — that's 15-plus points of alpha, and it's still acting well. No signs of distribution, no sloppy price action. The Relative Strength Engine flagged this one while it was already moving, and so far the move has only gotten cleaner. SNOW is right behind it. Day 9, up 16.92% vs SPY +4.36% — more than 12 points of alpha. We entered at $270.92 and it's now sitting at $316.77. That's the kind of drift a relative strength setup is built for: not a spike, just steady outperformance, session after session. DDOG sits on day 7, up 13.11% vs SPY's 5.74% — roughly 7.4 points of alpha. Not as clean as SNOW or CORT, but it's doing its job and staying out of trouble. Then there's EVC. Three separate entries in this name, and the results are a mixed bag. The day 22 position is the problem child: entered at $11.75, now sitting at $11.63, down about 1% while SPY ran 2.59% over the same stretch. That's -3.6% alpha, and it's been a drag from the start. The day 6 entry is essentially flat with negative alpha. The day 2 entry is barely positive and just about matching SPY. The Relative Strength Engine kept seeing something worth flagging here — and at this point, that's worth examining honestly. Three entries, three chances, and the best result is a 2.1% gain on day 2. EVC just hasn't followed through the way SNOW and CORT have.

Today's closed trades, post-mortem

No trades closed today, so there's no post-mortem to run. The book goes into tomorrow exactly as it sits.

What could change by tomorrow's open

The clearest risk on the sheet right now is EVC. Three positions in the same name is concentration — and that name is underperforming in a market that's been handing out gains freely. If SPY softens tomorrow and EVC can't hold its recent lows, that day 22 entry could get uncomfortable fast. The stronger positions — SNOW, CORT, DDOG — are far enough in the green to have room to breathe, but a sharp tape reversal would test whether those gains hold. Watch overnight for any macro catalysts that might shift the tone before the open.

What we're watching tomorrow

Twenty-two days in, the system sits at +3.2% vs SPY's +2.7% over the same window. That's a thin edge, and we're not pretending otherwise — SNOW and CORT are doing the heavy lifting right now. Tomorrow morning the engines run fresh scans. We'll find out whether EVC finally earns its place on the sheet, or whether the system stops asking the same question and moves on.

Advertisement · Sponsored by Behind the Markets

See the details →

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring