I'm a Stock Trader

One trade closed, one number our engine is still watching

A stop hit, a position drifting the wrong way, and one new name doing exactly what you want to see.
Scoreboard Update
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 16 System: -2.4% | SPY (same window): -1.6% | Alpha: -0.7% Win rate: 0% (0/4) Open positions: EVC (day 14, -5.7%), SNOW (day 1, +0.7%)

Advertisement · Sponsored by Weiss Ratings

564% or higher when the market doesn’t move?

There’s a program with a history of finding stock winners …
On the market’s quietest days. Feb. 18, 2025, was a day of no action.
Yet this algorithm recommended a stock that went up 610%.
Oct. 18, 2021, was another boring day. But this software recommended a 564% winner that day.
April 10, 2023? Another tame day, another big win.790% since then in fact.
So how did it do it?

To see the details about this rare opportunity - Click here to find out.

Today's market and our positions

SLS hit its stop today, and that stings. It's our fourth closed trade and fourth loss — 0-for-4 on the win rate right now, and we're not going to paper over that. The system is down 2.4% over 16 days. SPY is down 1.6% over the same window. We're trailing by about 0.7%. We knew going in that early drawdowns happen. That doesn't make a 0% win rate feel good — it just means we keep running the process and let the numbers accumulate. SPY itself barely moved today, closing near $739, essentially flat on the session, up 0.01%.

What our open trades are doing

EVC is on day 14, and it's the one keeping us up at night. Entry was $11.75. It's sitting at $11.12 right now — down 5.4% while SPY over that same stretch is down 1.7%. That's -3.7% alpha, and it's the wrong kind. The Relative Strength Engine flagged this one expecting it to hold up better than the market during a soft stretch. It hasn't. The stop is still the stop — we're not moving it — but we're not adding conviction here either. SNOW is the fresher face. Day 1, entered at $270.92, now at $272.88 — up 0.7% while SPY went nowhere today. The Relative Strength Engine grabbed this one because it was showing better relative tape action into a flat market. One day doesn't tell us much, but it's doing exactly what you want to see on day one: quiet outperformance while the index flatlines.

Today's closed trades, post-mortem

Here's the SLS post-mortem. We entered at $12.57 under the Relative Strength Engine, held for 7 days, and got stopped out today at $10.24. That's an -18.5% loss on the trade while SPY dropped 1.2% over the same window — alpha of -17.3%. The exit reason was stop_hit, which means the system did exactly what it was designed to do. The stop existed to define risk, and it triggered. The trade was wrong. The mistake, if there is one, isn't the stop — it's that the underlying relative strength thesis never held. SLS broke down hard while the market barely moved, which is about the worst outcome you can draw for an RS long. We'll look at whether there were early warning signs in the relative strength readings before the break. But sometimes a name just fails the thesis and you take the loss.

What could change by tomorrow's open

EVC is the live risk right now. Fourteen days in, underwater, and underperforming SPY. If it keeps drifting lower from here, it'll find the stop — and that would put another closed loss on the board. SNOW is too new to carry much structural risk yet; one session of data is basically nothing. The bigger picture is harder to ignore: four losses, zero wins. The system needs to catch a trade that works, and soon, or we're staring at a deeper hole. We're not in crisis mode — but we're not going to pretend the scoreboard looks fine, either.

What we're watching tomorrow

Tomorrow morning the engines run fresh scans. After a day where SPY went nowhere, the relative strength readings may have reshuffled — names that held up quietly while the index flatlined are exactly what the Relative Strength Engine is built to surface. Whether anything clears the signal threshold is a different question. We'll know at the open.

Advertisement · Sponsored by Behind the Markets

See the details →

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring