I'm a Stock Trader

The trade we closed this week did exactly what it was supposed to

One clean exit, three open positions, and a market that made none of it easy.
Weekly Recap
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 21 System: -1.5% | SPY (same window): -3.6% | Alpha: +2.1% Win rate: 75% (3/4) Open positions: PIII (day 12, -11.7%), CWAN (day 5, +0.2%), CUE (day 2, -3.9%)

Advertisement · Sponsored by Investpub

Sick of throwing away cash on options? Look here

According to our research on what we call "Supercharged Tickers," we have seen double and triple-digit gains on some of the market's most popular stocks.

Basically targeting options like returns without trading options.

You trade them exactly like regular stocks - no special approvals needed, no expiration dates to worry about, and zero time decay working against you.

So today, I'm pulling back the curtains on what these Supercharged Tickers are and how anyone can begin trading them.

I'll show you how these tickers can amplify returns by up to 4X compared to regular shares without trading any options either.

If you'd like to get started on these Supercharged Tickers, you best head over here now.

The week at a glance

EVC hit our target. The market fell apart. We still lost money on the week — and that's kind of the point. Week three closed with the system down -1.53%. SPY dropped -2.38% over the same five days. That's +0.85% alpha for the week, bringing our cumulative edge to +2.10% since day one. I'm not doing backflips over a losing week — but I'm not panicking either. Losing less than the benchmark in a down tape is exactly what this system is built to do. Here's the full picture: | Ticker | Engine | Opened | Status | Entry | P&L | Alpha | |--------|--------|--------|--------|-------|-----|-------| | EVC | Relative Strength | Jun 11 | Closed (target) | $9.05 → $11.58 | +23.87% | +24.47% | | PIII | Relative Strength | Jun 15 | Open (day 12) | $12.81 | -11.71% | -8.29% | | CWAN | Breakout | Jun 22 | Open (day 5) | $24.52 | +0.16% | +2.23% | | CUE | Relative Strength | Jun 25 | Open (day 2) | $26.43 | -3.93% | -3.21% | We also sat out two signals this week — setups that appeared on the watchlist but didn't earn an entry when the conditions around them deteriorated. We'll get into that in the risk section.

Trades we closed this week

EVC was the story this week — and it's a clean one. The Relative Strength Engine flagged it on June 11 at $9.05. Fourteen days later it closed at $11.58, a +23.87% gain with +24.47% alpha. Target hit, clean exit, no drama, no chasing. The setup had a clear fingerprint: EVC was holding its ground while the sector sold off around it. That's precisely what the Relative Strength Engine looks for. When the sector steadied, that pent-up relative strength resolved fast. That one win is carrying a lot of weight in the weekly numbers. Strip it out and the picture looks considerably uglier. One other closed-trade note worth keeping in mind: since day one, we're 3-for-4 on closed positions. Win rate sits at 75%. Small sample — I know. But it's not nothing.

What we tuned this week

Three open positions head into next week. Here's where each one stands and what we're watching. PIII is the uncomfortable one. The Relative Strength Engine entered at $12.81 on June 15, and the position is now down -11.71% on day 12. The alpha picture is a little less painful at -8.29% — PIII is underperforming, but SPY has been weak too. We haven't hit the stop. The system is still holding it. But this is the trade that demands honesty: it isn't working yet, and we're watching it closely. CWAN is essentially flat — entered at $24.52 via the Breakout Engine on June 22, sitting at +0.16% with +2.23% alpha five days in. What matters most here is that the breakout level held. Now we want to see it build. CUE is the newest position. The Relative Strength Engine entered at $26.43 on June 25, just two days ago, and it's showing -3.93%. Early days. The setup thesis hasn't changed — the market just didn't cooperate in the first 48 hours. We're giving it room. Nothing in the system was tuned this week. The two skipped signals were judgment calls: both setups appeared while the broader tape was deteriorating fast enough that the risk-reward looked off. We passed. That's the system working as intended — not every flag is a green light.

What we're cautious about next week

Here's the honest picture heading into next week: we're holding three open positions that are all underwater, in a market that just shed -2.38% in five days. If the selling continues, all three get squeezed at the same time. That's the scenario we don't love — a correlated drawdown with nowhere to hide inside the portfolio. PIII carries the most accumulated loss. If it breaks its stop level, that's a realized loss landing in the weekly number. We'd rather it didn't happen — but we're not moving the stop to avoid the pain. That's exactly how small losses turn into large ones. There's also the cost of the two skipped signals. If the market stabilizes and those names run without us, we'll have missed them. That's the price of being selective. We're comfortable with that tradeoff, but it's worth naming out loud. One more thing worth saying: three weeks is still a short track record. Don't mistake +2.10% cumulative alpha for a guarantee of anything. The system has earned a little credibility. It hasn't earned certainty.

Looking ahead to Monday

Next week, the system either starts recovering PIII and CUE, or it cuts them and we move on with cleaner books. There's no middle ground here — we don't hold losers forever hoping they find their way back. The stop is the stop. What I'll be watching most: whether CWAN can actually build on that breakout, and whether the broader market gives the Relative Strength names any room to breathe. A stabilizing tape helps all three open positions. Another week like the last one puts real pressure on the week-four number. Day 22 starts tomorrow.

Advertisement · Sponsored by Investpub

See the details →

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring