I'm a Stock Trader

Before you force a trade today, look at this threshold

Three engines ran this morning. Here's the exact line none of them could cross — and what changes that tomorrow.
Watchlist Preview
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 20 System: -1.3% | SPY (same window): -3.0% | Alpha: +1.8% Win rate: 75% (3/4) Open positions: PIII (day 11, -16.6%), CWAN (day 4, +0.2%), CUE (day 1, -3.4%)

Advertisement · Sponsored by Investpub

The secret behind approaching the market on your own terms

Hey, I’m Nate Tucci.
I’ve been neck deep in the markets for over a decade now.
I recently went live to reveal an income secret that goes against everything we’ve been taught about the markets.
Most folks don’t know it’s possible to approach the market on your own terms…
I mean either conservative, balanced, or aggressive.
And the secret is right there in the options market.
A phenomenon that Charles Schwab has studied extensively.
Right before our eyes, Wall Street has been exploiting this same secret in the options market, leveraging options that tilt the odds in its favor.
Our days of missing out on the party are over.

Tap here to see the nuts and bolts behind this approach.

Why no trade today

Odd day in the markets.  The scan came back empty.  Not 'close but no cigar' — just empty.  Every engine ran its full morning pass across the tape, and not one candidate crossed the threshold. That's happened maybe a handful of times in month of running this system live, so it's worth explaining what we actually saw — and why nothing qualified.  SPY is sitting near $732.69, off about 0.05% on the day. Not a crash, not a rip — just a tape that's drifting. Breadth is muted. No clear sector is leading, no obvious rotation is underway. The market isn't giving our engines much to work with, and our engines aren't in the business of manufacturing something out of nothing. We'll never give you action just to give you action.

Three names we're watching closest

Here's what each engine actually needs — and where today fell short. The Breakout Engine wants a stock that's been coiling near a clean resistance level and then breaks through on volume at least 1.5x its 20-day average.  Today's tape had a few names poking at levels, but volume was thin across the board. Breakouts without volume aren't breakouts — they're traps. Nothing passed that filter. The Mean Reversion Engine looks for names that've sold off sharply into a known support level — a pullback to the 20-day or 50-day moving average — with the selling pressure starting to dry up. The problem today: some names are pulling back, but the selling isn't fading yet. They're still in freefall. The engine won't touch a falling knife, and that's exactly the right call.  The Relative Strength Engine hunts for stocks holding up unusually well against a weak tape — names quietly building a base while the index drifts lower. Today, though, the index isn't weak enough for that contrast to mean anything. When SPY is flat, it's hard to stand out against it.

What would trigger us tomorrow

So what would we need to see tomorrow for an engine to actually fire? For the Breakout Engine: a name that's spent at least a week coiling just below a clear price level — a round number, a prior high, a well-defined shelf — and opens tomorrow with volume already moving above that 20-day average by 8 a.m. Volume has to lead the move, not trail it. For the Mean Reversion Engine: a quality name with a decent float, liquid options, and a clean chart that's pulled back four to six percent over two or three days and lands near its 20-day moving average on noticeably thinner volume than the selling days. That 'drying up' moment is the key — the engine needs to see conviction fade before it steps in. For the Relative Strength Engine: a stock that stays green or flat while SPY drops 0.5% or more. Ideally, it's been doing that two or three days running. That kind of quiet resilience is exactly what the engine is hunting for. In the meantime, we're staying long SPY. Not exciting — but it keeps us in the market while we wait for the right pitch.

The cost of waiting (or forcing it)

There's a real cost to patience, and we all feel it. Sitting on your hands while a position like PIII is underwater — down 16.6% on day 11 — is uncomfortable. The temptation is to force something, to find a trade that sort of fits just so it feels like we're doing something. But forcing it carries a bigger cost. A trade we don't fully believe in is a trade where we've already compromised our edge before the opening bell. The setups that come from 'close enough' thinking? Historically, that's where most of the losses live. Win rate is sitting at 75% across four closed trades. That number holds because we don't lower the bar when the market makes things hard. Twenty days in, the system is at -1.3% while SPY over the same window sits at -3.0% — that's +1.8% alpha. That spread doesn't happen by accident, and it doesn't survive sloppy entries.

One more thought before we go

Tomorrow the engines run again at the open. CWAN is barely above water at +0.2% on day four. CUE is a fresh position — day one, down 3.4%, early days. PIII is the one we're watching most closely; eleven days in, that position needs to find its footing soon. If breadth firms up overnight and volume starts showing up in individual names, we could have a real candidate by tomorrow morning. If it stays this quiet, we wait again. The market doesn't owe us a setup — we just have to be ready when one finally shows up.

Advertisement · Sponsored by Investpub

See the details →

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring