I'm a Stock Trader

Our Breakout Engine is watching one level that keeps getting tested

Three engines scanned the tape this morning. Here's exactly what would change their answer tomorrow.
Watchlist Preview
EXPERIMENT UPDATE — Day 15 System: -0.7% | SPY (same window): -1.3% | Alpha: +0.6% Win rate: 67% (2/3) Open positions: EVC (day 8, +9.0%), PIII (day 4, -16.1%)

Advertisement · Sponsored by Investpub

Check out what happens when Wall Street’s algos start to glitch

I’ve come across some of the most powerful "glitches" and "mishaps" in both the stock and options markets.
Think about it...
You've got all these machines, algorithms, and market makers all trying to operate the very same financial system at the same time.
Glitches were bound to happen.
But after obsessing over the data, I found one of these "mishaps" that pops up every single week.

I put together the full blueprint and all the proof right here so you can see the logic for yourself

Why no trade today

Every engine ran this morning. Every engine said no. That's actually rare — 15 days in, this is the first complete shutout across all three. So what did the tape look like? SPY has now given back more ground than our system has since Day 1 — down 1.3% over our window versus our system's -0.7% — but the intraday action this morning felt like a market arguing with itself. Breadth was choppy, advancers and decliners nearly split. No sector was leading. Volume ran light against the 20-day average, which is exactly the kind of low-conviction environment where our engines go quiet on purpose. Forcing a trade into a directionless tape generates noise, not edge. So we waited. We're still long SPY as our baseline position, which kept us in the game without overcommitting to a market that hadn't made up its mind.

Three names we're watching closest

Each of our three engines runs a specific checklist, and today each one hit a wall at a different step — which tells you something about how broad the problem was. The Breakout Engine looks for a stock clearing a defined resistance level on volume that's at least 1.5x its 20-day average. That volume requirement is the gate. This morning we had names sitting near levels, but none with the volume to confirm. Without it, a breakout is just a drift — and we've learned to tell the difference. The Mean Reversion Engine needs a stock that's pulled back sharply into a known support zone, oversold on a short-term basis but still healthy on the weekly chart. The problem today: the names that looked oversold were oversold for a reason. Their weekly charts looked broken, not resting. The engine won't touch those. The Relative Strength Engine scans for stocks holding up better than SPY during a broad pullback — leaders showing relative strength while everything else fades. A handful of candidates surfaced early, but when SPY stabilized mid-morning, those names didn't accelerate. They just stopped being interesting. Three engines saying no on the same day is a data point. It's not a crisis.

What would trigger us tomorrow

Here's exactly what we'd want to see at tomorrow's open for any engine to flag a live setup. For the Breakout Engine: a name that's been consolidating tight for at least five days, sitting just below a clean prior high, with pre-market or opening volume already trending above its average. The tighter the consolidation, the better — coiled is what we're hunting. For the Mean Reversion Engine: a stock that's pulled back cleanly to its 20-day moving average on shrinking volume. Dry volume is the tell that sellers are exhausted rather than pressing. A one- or two-day bounce attempt followed by a volume pickup the next morning is the entry trigger. For the Relative Strength Engine: SPY needs to be soft or flat, and we need a name that's positive on the day by at least half a percent relative to the index — holding above its prior day's close while SPY is red. That spread is what the engine is hunting. None of that appeared today. Any one of those pictures shows up tomorrow, and we'll have something real to talk about.

The cost of waiting (or forcing it)

There's a real cost to sitting on your hands — and a real cost to not sitting on your hands. The cost of patience today is one missed day of potential gains. Given that SPY itself was choppy and going nowhere, that cost is probably small. The cost of forcing a trade we don't believe in is harder to quantify but historically much larger. PIII is our current reminder of that: sitting at -16.1% on Day 4, still within the parameters we set, but not comfortable. We don't want to add another uncomfortable position just to feel productive. The system's job is to say no when no is the right answer. Today, no was the right answer.

One more thought before we go

Fifteen days in, we're down 0.7% as a system while SPY is down 1.3% in the same window. That's a thin margin and we're not celebrating it — two open positions, one working and one hurting. What we're watching tomorrow is whether the tape finally picks a direction. A market that commits — up or down — tends to produce setups. A market that drifts produces noise. Right now, it's drifting. Let's see if that changes.

Advertisement · Sponsored by Investpub

See the details →

See how the system backtests →

How our rebuilt system performs against the S&P 500 in testing — year by year, with the honest caveats.


Keep exploring